The obvious table to put here would be each utility’s cheapest time-of-use plan against its cheapest plan without one. It was computed, and then left out, because it would have misled. A tariff record carries no service zone, so inside a single utility the two cheapest schedules are frequently not offers the same household can choose between: one pair came out as a New York City rate against a Westchester one, another as a coastal rate against a low-income inland one. The difference would have read as a saving, and part of it was a difference of territory.
The second reason is the profile. This site prices every plan on consumption spread evenly across the hours, because no load-shape dataset has been adopted for it — the methodology page says so. An even household is the one household a time-of-use plan is easy to price, and the one nobody is. Whether a schedule would lower your bill depends on when you use electricity, and this site does not know that.
What it does know is on this page. Take the spread and the peak hours to your own bill: multiply the kilowatt-hours you could genuinely move out of those hours by the gap, and weigh that against everything else the plan charges. The rate comparator prices any published plan at the consumption you give it.